16C43.89 John Walter Adam 7 BIGELOW, son of Spencer 6 ( Eleizer 5 , Joshua 4 , Eleazer 3 Joshua2, John1), and Mary Mathilda (PAYNE) BIGELOW, was born near Holly, Oakland, MI on 28 January 1866 and married on 12 April 1890 Grace Horton. She was born in Oakland county, MI on 27 September 1872 and died on 28 October 1903 at Perry, MI. John died on 12 April 1940 at Morrice, MI. The 1910 census notes that Walter remarried in 1907 a Minerva __________ . This record notes Minerva as wife but the age looks to be 70 and the 7 is clearly different than the 4s within the same page. The records notes that current marriage is Walter's 2nd and Minerva's 1st and that she has no children. (see below)
Children of John Walter Adam and Grace (Horton) Bigelow:
16C43.891t Zoe Lenore, b 23 June 1891; d 15 Jan 1975 Lansing, lngham, MI; m 20 June 1912 Elta J. Beebe; 6 children.
16C43.892 Fred Howard, b 27 Aug 1894; d 07 May 1961 Ann Arbor, Washtenaw, MI; res. New Haven and Howell, MI.
16C43.893 Maude Nila, b 09 Dec 1902; d _____ ; m Harry J. Sweet; res. Rochester, MI.
Sources:
Bigelow Family Genealogy Volume. I page ;
Bigelow Family Genealogy Volume. II page 283;
correspondence with a Beebe descendant.
Subject: 16C43.89
John Walter Adam
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:30:55 -0400
From: "Scott Barker" <sbarker3@ptd.net>
Rod,
1900 census Independence, Oakland, Michigan
1910 census Clayton, Genesee, Michigan
The 1900 census record notes both Joe (Zoe) and Fred Bigelow that
corresponds
to your information.
However, the 1910 census notes that Walter remarried in 1907 a
Minerva
__________ . This record notes Minerva as wife but the age looks
to
be 70
and the 7 is clearly different than the 4s within the same page.
The
records notes that current marriage is Walter's 2nd and Minerva's 1st
and
that she has no children. The 1910 records shows no other
children
other than Fred H who was aged 15 years so it is most likely the same
Walter
and
Fred who are on the 1900 record.
Can't explain whether Minerva is second wife or other relative who was
mistakenly
noted as wife....so either age is wrong or relationship is wrong.
No explanation as to what happend to Maud as I have not been able to
locate
the family in records after 1910.